this app is at high risk has been banned its operation что делать
Как разблокировать загрузчик Realme 8/8 Pro
Следуйте этому руководству, чтобы узнать, как разблокировать загрузчик на Realme 8 и Realme 8 Pro. Большинство современных телефонов Android поставляются с заблокированными загрузчиками, что затрудняет установку пользовательских ПЗУ, модов, ядер или даже включение root с помощью Magisk. К счастью, загрузчик Realme 8 можно разблокировать за несколько простых шагов.
Заблокированный загрузчик — это барьер, который не позволяет пользователям изменять программное обеспечение своих устройств. К счастью, загрузчик Realme 8 можно легко разблокировать. Как только это будет сделано, пользователи могут продолжить и рутировать телефон, установить Magisk и установить пользовательские ПЗУ.
Как разблокировать загрузчик Realme 8
Загрузчик — это важный фрагмент кода, который запускается перед операционной системой. Он дает телефону инструкции по загрузке и поиску ядра системы. Другими словами, ваш телефон, и в данном случае Realme 8, не может загрузиться без загрузчика.
В целях безопасности OEM-производители заранее блокируют загрузчик. Это делает устройство более безопасным и менее уязвимым для манипуляций. Однако это также лишает потребителей возможности прошивать ПЗУ и пользовательские моды. В итоге загрузчик нужно разблокировать, чтобы производить какие-либо манипуляции с прошивкой.
Предварительные условия
При разблокировке загрузчика удаляются все данные на вашем телефоне. Сюда входят приложения, фотографии, видео, сообщения и все, что хранится на вашем телефоне. Прежде чем продолжить, сделайте полную резервную копию важных данных.
Шаги по разблокировке загрузчика на Realme 8
Вот и все. Вы только что разблокировали загрузчик на своем Realme 8. Когда телефон загрузится, вы получите предупреждение о том, что загрузчик разблокирован. Это означает, что команды были успешными. Теперь вы можете рутировать свой телефон с помощью Magisk и устанавливать пользовательские ПЗУ.
This app is at high risk has been banned its operation что делать
За последние годы человечество умудрилось перейти на цифровые способы оплаты и получения денег. С одной стороны – это крайне позитивный и инновационный сигнал, свидетельствующий о повышении финансовой грамотности среди населения большинства стран. Вот только всё это привело к массе неприятных последствий, когда мошенники могут украсть ваши деньги удалённо, а безналичный способ оплаты снижает контроль за личными финансами, в результате люди совершают необдуманные траты, о которых могут в будущем пожалеть. В качестве одного из драйверов цифровых инноваций называют криптовалюты и биржи, ставшие добровольными посредниками между держателями цифровых денег.
реклама
Поскольку самой крупной из подобных структур является Binance, то часто именно она становится замешана в неприятных и даже конфликтных ситуациях. Сегодня именно такой случай, свидетельствующий о том, что биржа вольна делать всё что угодно, а ответственность за это будут нести пользователи. Так, в ходе одной из ошибок Binance совершила целую серию повторных переводов на неизвестные счета. Предположим, с февраля 2019 года по февраль 2020 года вы со своего аккаунта на бирже делали перевод в Dogecoin на адрес знакомого вам человека. Так вот, Binance снова продублировала переводы. Хорошо, если вы помните, кому и сколько отправляли, а если это были обменники, которые давно исчезли в неизвестном направлении, то всё очень плохо.
Дело в том, что ребята из Binance требуют возврата денег с тех, кто ранее подобные переводы осуществлял. Проще говоря, если в 2019 году 1 монета стоила 0.0026 доллара, то сегодня 0.26, что в 100 раз дороже, а пользователям, со счетов которых продублировали транзакции, выставили минусовые счета. Один из пострадавших пишет, что в 2019 году за 30 000 монет выручил 78 долларов, в то время как сегодня должен выплатить бирже свыше 7000 долларов. Мало того, у него было 2 таких перевода, в результате долг вырос до 15 000 долларов.
Lockdown-ready Austria has its PCR system tricked
Children around the world can breathe a sigh of relief: Papa Smurf has not contracted Covid-19. That’s according to the ‘Alles Gurgelt!’ rapid test system used in the Austrian capital, Vienna. The project, which is backed by the government of Vienna and offers free home tests, recently issued a Covid-19 certificate to the fictional cartoon character after he received a negative PCR test result.
The system, which is operated by Austrian company LEAD Horizon and Italian Lifebrain laboratory network, allows people to pick up test kits at shops and test themselves at home after registering with a special app. The test can then be submitted to a laboratory through another retail chain.
Verification involves filming yourself gargling the testing solution and sending the sample bottle to the laboratory. But when Kronen Zeitung editor Michael Pommer decided to check how thorough the widely-praised system is in its verification procedures, the results were not particularly reassuring.
Pommer registered with Alles Gurgelt! under his real name on Tuesday, but instead of filming himself gargling, he filmed an image of Papa Smurf and filled the sample bottle with tap water. Apparently, no one even saw the video, since Pommer successfully received a certificate, the Kronen Zeitung reported on Sunday, pointing out the “glaring security gaps” in the system, which Vienna’s health minister, Peter Hacker, called “unique in the world,” praising it as a “central component in Vienna’s fight against the pandemic.”
The minister warned that anyone who tries to receive the certificate – which grants entry to venues such as restaurants, clubs, and hair salons – by tricking the system could face charges of endangering the public with transmissible diseases – and this could mean up to three years behind bars if done intentionally, and up to one year if it is due to negligence. There could also be a fine of up to €1,450 ($1,660).
It seems, however, that the system could struggle to detect offenders in the first place. According to the Kronen Zeitung, between 100,000 and 200,000 samples are analyzed every day as part of the program. Verification data is evaluated by a special team through random checks. Between 7,000 and 10,000 actual checks are carried out every week, which is only a small portion of the tests.
The system operators told the paper that they are currently working on an AI solution that would validate the uploaded ID images and identify people in the testing videos before reporting suspicious cases. They also vowed to expand the random checks.
By mid-October, 10 million tests had been analyzed as part of the program. It was also expanded to cover school and kindergarten tests in Vienna.
However, people might soon find fewer ways to circumvent the government restrictions, as Austria has become the first nation to introduce a nationwide lockdown for the unvaccinated, starting on Monday.
Like this story? Share it with a friend!
US claims 2019 airstrike that hit Syrian women and children was justified
Baghuz bombing of people trying to escape fighting was covered up, says NY Times report
The bombs were dropped by a US F-15 plane, watched by stunned US drone operators in Qatar. Photograph: Joe Giddens/PA
The bombs were dropped by a US F-15 plane, watched by stunned US drone operators in Qatar. Photograph: Joe Giddens/PA
Last modified on Sun 14 Nov 2021 18.45 GMT
The US military has confirmed for the first time a 2019 airstrike in Syria that killed up to 80 people, mostly women and children, but claimed the strike was justified as it killed Islamic State fighters who were attacking coalition forces.
The confirmation from US Central Command followed a report by the New York Times in which former and current Pentagon officials alleged there had been a cover-up of a likely war crime. Central Command argued that because some women and children had taken up arms for IS, whether by indoctrination or choice, they “could not strictly be classified as civilians”.
The strike was carried out on 18 March 2019 on the town of Baghuz on the Euphrates River, which forms the Syrian-Iraq border, where Syrian Democratic Forces (SDF), with US air support, were besieging the last organised remnants of IS in Syria.
The Times report said two bombs were dropped on a crowd of women and children, trying to escape the fighting on the banks of the Euphrates, who had been identified as civilians by a US drone operated from Qatar. It said the drone operators in Al-Udeid airbase were stunned when they saw the first 500lb bomb dropped by a US F-15E plane, and then a second, 2,000lb bomb dropped on the survivors.
“Who dropped that?” one analyst asked on a chat system used by those monitoring the drone footage, according to the report. Within minutes, a legal officer flagged a possible war crime that required investigation, and ordered the drone footage and other evidence. The initial battle damage assessment put the death toll at 70. But no independent inquiry was ever carried out.
The air force lawyer, Lt Col Dean Korsak, took the case to the Pentagon inspector general, but the subsequent report was stripped of any mention of the strike. Korsak subsequently sent details of the incident to the Senate armed services committee.
“I’m putting myself at great risk of military retaliation for sending this,” Korsak wrote to the committee, in emails obtained by the Times. “Senior ranking US military officials intentionally and systematically circumvented the deliberate strike process.”
Gene Tate, a civilian analyst in the inspector general’s office, who complained about the lack of action, was forced out of his job.
The New York Times investigation found that the airstrike at Baghuz was called in by a shadowy US special forces unit known as Task Force 9, operating independently from the operations centre in Qatar, and which appears to have side-stepped the procedures put in place to minimise civilian casualties.
The Central Command said the context for the airstrikes was a desperate last stand by IS, referred to by the alternative acronym Isis.
“The Isis pocket included thousands of fighters and family members including women and children,” said Capt Bill Urban, the Central Command spokesman. “The remaining fighters including some women and child combatants, along with many Isis family members, including some who were likely held against their will, decided to make a determined stand in an area that included buildings, tunnels and cliffs. Multiple entreaties to Isis to allow family members to depart the area were rebuffed, and thousands of family members remained in the area of the fighting.”
Urban said that on the morning of 18 March, IS fighters launched a counterattack on SDF positions that lasted several hours, during which an SDF position was in danger of being overrun, and US special forces called in an airstrike. He said that they were unaware that a drone with a high-definition video footage was in the area and relied on a standard definition feed from another drone.
According to the Central Command account, the drones over Baghuz had used all their Hellfire missiles, so the air support available came from F-15s, which dropped three bombs.
The bombs killed at least 16 IS fighters, according to the US military assessment. It also confirmed four civilian deaths.
“The investigations were unable to conclusively characterise the status of more than 60 other casualties that resulted from these strikes. The reason for this uncertainty is that multiple armed women and at least one armed child were observed in the video, and the exact mixture of armed and unarmed personnel could not be conclusively determined,” Urban said.
“Likely, a majority of those killed were also combatants at the time of the strike, however, it is also highly likely that there were additional civilians killed by these two strikes,” he added. An investigation ordered by special forces commanders found the strike was justified as self-defence, and “proportional due to the unavailability of smaller ordinance at the time of the request”.
As a consequence however, procedures were changed to require high definition video surveillance before such strikes are ordered, and that the “strike cell” on the ground should coordinate with any coalition aircraft.
“We abhor the loss of innocent life and take all possible measures to prevent them,” Urban said.
Patients are dying from being stuck in ambulances outside A&E, report says
Exclusive: handover delays across England are also causing permanent harm to those needing urgent care
Further harm is being caused owing to ambulances being unable to attend to new emergencies as they are waiting to hand over patients at hospitals. Photograph: Daniel Leal-Olivas/AFP/Getty Images
Further harm is being caused owing to ambulances being unable to attend to new emergencies as they are waiting to hand over patients at hospitals. Photograph: Daniel Leal-Olivas/AFP/Getty Images
Last modified on Sun 14 Nov 2021 21.04 GMT
People are dying in the back of ambulances and up to 160,000 more a year are coming to harm because they are stuck outside hospitals unable to be offloaded to A&E, a bombshell report has revealed.
Patients are also dying soon after finally getting admitted to hospital after spending long periods in the back of an ambulance, while others still in their own homes are not being saved because paramedics are trapped at A&E and unable to answer 999 calls, said the report by NHS ambulance service bosses in England.
In addition, about 12,000 of the 160,000 are suffering “severe harm” such as a permanent setback to their health. These include people with life-threatening health emergencies such as chest pains, sepsis, heart problems, epilepsy and Covid-19 because growing numbers of paramedics are having to wait increasingly long times to hand over a patient to A&E staff.
Ambulance logjams outside hospitals have become a major problem in the NHS in recent years as A&E staff have struggled to find beds for patients they have decided to admit because the hospital has run out of beds as a result of Covid-19, their inability to discharge patients who are medically fit to leave and the record demand for care.
That has left A&E personnel having to limit the number of patients who can be in their unit at one time, which leads to sometimes long queues of ambulances outside. The problem has become much more serious in recent months as all NHS services have seen unprecedented demand for care.
Labour and the Liberal Democrats said the “staggering” extent of damage to patients’ health underlined the risks posed by the deepening crisis facing NHS ambulance services.
The report, seen by the Guardian, has been drawn up by the Association of Ambulance Chief Executives (AACE) and is based on official NHS figures, which until now were secret. AACE represents the chief executives of England’s 10 regional ambulance services, all of which have had to declare an alert in recent months after being faced with unprecedented demands for help.
It concludes that: “When very sick patients arrive at hospital and then have to wait an excessive time for handover to emergency department clinicians to receive assessment and definitive care, it is entirely predictable and almost inevitable that some level of harm will arise.
“This may take the form of a deteriorating medical or physical condition, or distress and anxiety, potentially affecting the outcome for patients and definitely creating a poor patient experience.”
It does not say how many patients a year die because so many ambulances are stuck at hospitals. But it adds: “We know that some patients have sadly died whilst waiting outside ED [emergency departments], or shortly after eventual admission to ED following a wait. Others have died while waiting for an ambulance response in the community.
“Regardless of whether a death may have been an inevitable outcome, this is not the level of care or experience we would wish for anyone in their last moments. Any form or level of harm is not acceptable.”
AACE studied all handover delays lasting more than an hour that occurred across the 10 ambulance trusts on 4 January, and the harm resulting. It used the data to estimate how many patients a year suffer a deterioration in their health, or need much more invasive treatment such as surgery, as a direct result of waiting a long time to be treated by doctors and nurses.
It concluded that: “If these results from 4 January 2021, which was not an atypical day, are extrapolated across all handover delays that occur every day, the cases of potential harm could be as high as 160,000 patients affected a year.
“Of those, approximately 12,000 patients could potentially experience severe harm as a result of delayed handovers.”
Daisy Cooper, the Liberal Democrats’ health spokesperson, said: “These staggering figures will shock people to their core. These are absolutely devastating findings, which reveal that there is a huge toll of harm and severe harm, including tragically patient deaths, as a direct result of the colossal number of ambulance handover delays we’re now seeing.”
Ambulances are meant to hand patients over to A&E staff within 15 minutes, with none waiting more than half an hour. However, queues of as many as 15 ambulances at a time have been building up outside hospitals in recent years because hard-pressed staff have been too busy to accept them.
Last month the West Midlands ambulance service admitted publicly that handover delays were causing “catastrophic” harm to patients. Mark Docherty, its nursing director, said that despite its best efforts “we know patients are coming to harm” and that some patients “are dying before we get to them”.
Pressure on its ambulances forced the service to raise the risk assessment of harm to patients from level 20 to level 25 – the highest ever. “The definition of 25 is that harm is almost certain – and it’s going to be catastrophic. I think we’re now at that place,” Docherty added.
Jonathan Ashworth, the shadow health secretary, said: “This is a devastating report. The scale of harm and severe harm being done to patients is a scandal.
“Ministers should be ashamed that colossal numbers of patients – thanks to years of Tory NHS neglect – are languishing in ambulances waiting for vital life-saving care at risk of, and indeed suffering, serious harm, permanent disability or loss of life.”
Hospitals are under such pressure that about 190,000 handovers a month – around half the total – now take longer than they should, AACE’s report said. Paramedics have been warning that patients whose health has collapsed in their home or another setting have also been put at risk because being trapped outside A&Es means they are not available to respond quickly to 999 calls.
A series of recent incidents illustrate the crisis confronting ambulance services:
A patient died after spending about an hour in an ambulance outside Addenbrooke’s hospital in Cambridge on 24 October. The patient had suffered a cardiac arrest. The hospital said the patient had “remained in the ambulance due to significant pressures on A&E”.
John Swinney, Scotland’s deputy first minister, last week apologised for the “agony” endured by the family of Richard Brown, who died on the stairs outside his flat in Glasgow after waiting five hours for an ambulance
A patient died of a cardiac arrest in Worcestershire royal hospital in Worcester on 4 October after waiting five hours in an ambulance outside. Paramedics warned A&E staff the patient was having trouble breathing but the patient died despite being rushed into the resuscitation room.
A woman died in eastern England last month after waiting an hour for an ambulance crew to reach her on what should have been a seven-minute response. No crews were available in the 50 miles between Cromer and Waveney in Norfolk, so an ambulance from Ipswich in Suffolk had to answer the 999 call.
A Department of Health and Social Care spokesperson said: “We are committed to supporting ambulance crews who work tirelessly responding to emergencies every day. NHS England and Improvement has given ambulance trusts an extra £55m to boost staff numbers for winter, helping them to bolster capacity in control rooms and on the frontline.
“We are supporting the NHS to meet the unprecedented pressures it is facing, with record investment this year including an extra £5.4bn over the next six months to support its response to Covid-19 and £36bn for health and care over the next three years.”